the film just made me think about how companies and governments sort of control everything we do.do anything they don't like, even if its enjoying a song a certain way and they make us pay ridiculous fines and lock us up.
in this battle, i think i am generally neutral, but leaning towards copyleft. there is an entire culture surrounding remixing and mashing that we need to keep alive. but there should also be some limits to what we do with things. For example, let's say you wrote a song, it blew up and everyone knows it, there are 2 artists that want to "remix" your song and make it into their own style. artist 1 has made it completely different, you can still tell it's your song, but the new song is completely original. artist 2 takes your song, slows, and pitches it down and calls it new. artist 2 should probably get in trouble for that. i think that they are almost one in the same, you need production to have consumption, and you need consumption to have production. the only thing that people are doing is we are blurring the line a bit, which is perfectly fine, but the big guys in charge are taking consumption away, so we make consumption out of production, and thus you get remixing. visual arts is a bit trickier than other forms of art, people have found so many ways off ripping of other people's works in the art community. using a photo that somebody else took and painting the picture should be fine. see yourself in that situation, you took a photo and posted it on your public page, you see someone make art of that photo, chances are that you are going to be impressed by it and you would like it. in the online art community people have traced, recoloured, and stolen peoples works, and passed it off as "using a reference" or "my art style changes a lot". if you want to draw a character in your own style or make headcannons, it should be able to carry on.
0 Comments
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2021
Categories |